Have you ever wondered how something as huge as a ship could possibly float in water? We tend to think that lighter objects float and heavier objects sink. But, it just takes a small stone and a heavy ship to disprove that thought.
Let's start with simple questions first. When you drop an object into water, what could happen? It could either float or sink. Have you heard of the word called 'flink'? Meaning, neither float or sink. (I don't think it's an actual word though!) The object is fully immersed in water and is neither moving up nor down. Have you seen that ever?
There must be something right, that decides how much each objects gets to get wet, there must be something. And that's what we are going to read further on.
As usual, it all happened when a great guy born like long long ago, called Archimedes, said this :
When you put an object in water, the volume of water it displaces is equal to the volume of the object inside the water.
Seems logical right. Just keep this in mind. It will come handy a little later in the post. Now, try this simple experiment at home, right now. Take an object that you know floats for sure. ( I took my son's bath duck ) Hold it in your hand and push it deep into a bucket full of water, and let go of it. What happens to it? It comes back up. Who pushes it up? The water. This force of water, or the upward push is called 'upthrust'. Now where is this force when I throw a stone or a coin into the bucket?
It is there, but it isn't enough. What did I just mean?
If the upthrust is more than the weight of the object, the object floats. If the upthrust is lesser than the weight of the object, the object sinks. Sounds elementary isn't it? If the upward force is more than the downward force, the object remains up. If the downward force is more than the upward force, the object goes down. The coin, that sinks, experiences lesser upthrust than its own weight.
How do we measure this upthrust? When everyone else in the world long long ago was puzzled with this one question, our genius, Archimedes came up with a principle, stating that
"Upthrust, that is exerted on a body immersed in a fluid, whether fully or partially submerged, is equal to the weight of the fluid that the body displaces."
So in the coin case, the weight of the water it displaces is lesser than its own weight. Meaning, it is more denser than water. (Density = Mass/Volume.)
So, the density of the object decides the sinking or the floating behaviour. To understand why a ship floats, do this simple experiment at home. Take a vessel, and some spoons and forks. Drop them in a bucket of water. You see the vessel floats, while the spoons and forks sink. The vessel holds air inside it, making it less denser. Which is why a ship floats while a stone sinks.
Let me suggest a tweak to your float-sink experiment. Keep adding salt to your water. See if something changes. What changes? Some objects that previously sank in the water, now float. So the density of the liquid/medium matters. It's the density of the object as compared to that of the liquid it is in that decides the float sink thing.
We've learnt that there is something called upthrust which is an upward force. We also know that archimedes has taught us how to measure upthrust. We also know what makes ships float. We are not happy. We are thinkers. We think, but why does this upthrust exist at all?
The explanation goes on something like this.... In a column of water, the lower layers are under greater pressure than the upper layers. (because the lower layers experience the weight of the upper layers) So when an object is placed in the water, the bottom part of the object experiences more pressure than the top part of it. Which means to say, the object experiences a net pressure from the medium/water in the upward direction. And that is this upthrust. "Aahaa..."
So.. does upthrust increase with water depth then? Technically, once the body is fully immersed, the amount of water it displaces is constant. So the upthrust should also be constant. But we just said the lower layers exert a lot of pressure. So shouldn't there be a lot of upthrust as the body goes deeper?? What is wrong in the statement I just made?
Yes, the lower layers exert a lot of pressure. But upthrust is the difference in pressure experienced by the top and bottom layers of the object. That difference remains a constant! And so does the upthrust.
Now.. have you noticed the behaviour of tall objects, like when I place an empty glass tumbler in water, the tumbler tilts and maybe even topples off. Add some water to the glass, and you see that the glass stabilises. What is this tilt and stability and who do they depend on?
Apparently, there's something called centre of buoyancy and centre of gravity.
Centre of gravity or centre of mass is the one point where the weight of the object seems like it is acting from. Let's say you have a medium size plate in your hand. The centre of gravity will be the spot where you could balance it on your one finger. (perpendicular-ly)
Centre of buoyancy, similarly is the point where the buoyancy force seems like it acts from. That is to say, just consider the part of the object immersed in the water and find its centre point.
If the Centre of gravity is located below the centre of buoyancy, the object wouldn't topple. Do watch this wonderful video from this wonderful website for a lovely animation regarding the very same point.
For the interested, do go through these wonderful TedEd videos about archimedes and the history behind his principle here and here. Nice interesting story! I found them a delight. And for the ever curious minds, read the next post on submarines after having said "Hail Archimedes"!
Let's start with simple questions first. When you drop an object into water, what could happen? It could either float or sink. Have you heard of the word called 'flink'? Meaning, neither float or sink. (I don't think it's an actual word though!) The object is fully immersed in water and is neither moving up nor down. Have you seen that ever?
There must be something right, that decides how much each objects gets to get wet, there must be something. And that's what we are going to read further on.
As usual, it all happened when a great guy born like long long ago, called Archimedes, said this :
When you put an object in water, the volume of water it displaces is equal to the volume of the object inside the water.
Seems logical right. Just keep this in mind. It will come handy a little later in the post. Now, try this simple experiment at home, right now. Take an object that you know floats for sure. ( I took my son's bath duck ) Hold it in your hand and push it deep into a bucket full of water, and let go of it. What happens to it? It comes back up. Who pushes it up? The water. This force of water, or the upward push is called 'upthrust'. Now where is this force when I throw a stone or a coin into the bucket?
It is there, but it isn't enough. What did I just mean?
If the upthrust is more than the weight of the object, the object floats. If the upthrust is lesser than the weight of the object, the object sinks. Sounds elementary isn't it? If the upward force is more than the downward force, the object remains up. If the downward force is more than the upward force, the object goes down. The coin, that sinks, experiences lesser upthrust than its own weight.
How do we measure this upthrust? When everyone else in the world long long ago was puzzled with this one question, our genius, Archimedes came up with a principle, stating that
"Upthrust, that is exerted on a body immersed in a fluid, whether fully or partially submerged, is equal to the weight of the fluid that the body displaces."
So in the coin case, the weight of the water it displaces is lesser than its own weight. Meaning, it is more denser than water. (Density = Mass/Volume.)
So, the density of the object decides the sinking or the floating behaviour. To understand why a ship floats, do this simple experiment at home. Take a vessel, and some spoons and forks. Drop them in a bucket of water. You see the vessel floats, while the spoons and forks sink. The vessel holds air inside it, making it less denser. Which is why a ship floats while a stone sinks.
Let me suggest a tweak to your float-sink experiment. Keep adding salt to your water. See if something changes. What changes? Some objects that previously sank in the water, now float. So the density of the liquid/medium matters. It's the density of the object as compared to that of the liquid it is in that decides the float sink thing.
We've learnt that there is something called upthrust which is an upward force. We also know that archimedes has taught us how to measure upthrust. We also know what makes ships float. We are not happy. We are thinkers. We think, but why does this upthrust exist at all?

So.. does upthrust increase with water depth then? Technically, once the body is fully immersed, the amount of water it displaces is constant. So the upthrust should also be constant. But we just said the lower layers exert a lot of pressure. So shouldn't there be a lot of upthrust as the body goes deeper?? What is wrong in the statement I just made?
Yes, the lower layers exert a lot of pressure. But upthrust is the difference in pressure experienced by the top and bottom layers of the object. That difference remains a constant! And so does the upthrust.
Now.. have you noticed the behaviour of tall objects, like when I place an empty glass tumbler in water, the tumbler tilts and maybe even topples off. Add some water to the glass, and you see that the glass stabilises. What is this tilt and stability and who do they depend on?
Apparently, there's something called centre of buoyancy and centre of gravity.
Centre of gravity or centre of mass is the one point where the weight of the object seems like it is acting from. Let's say you have a medium size plate in your hand. The centre of gravity will be the spot where you could balance it on your one finger. (perpendicular-ly)
Centre of buoyancy, similarly is the point where the buoyancy force seems like it acts from. That is to say, just consider the part of the object immersed in the water and find its centre point.
If the Centre of gravity is located below the centre of buoyancy, the object wouldn't topple. Do watch this wonderful video from this wonderful website for a lovely animation regarding the very same point.