Thursday, July 30, 2015

Why celebrate someone only after they are gone?

Today is the 30th of July, 2015. The day one of the most revered, respected, loved, admired man from India takes his final journey, Dr. APJ Abdul Kalam, the former President of India, the missile man of India, a motivational speaker, an intelligent man, a man with the golden heart, a wonderful human being (not necessarily in that order). The man who said, "If I die, please don't declare a holiday. Instead work an extra day, if you can". The man whose shared his years of wisdom with the students of the country, hoping to motivate them towards an even better India.

Today is a holiday because the government wanted to facilitate those who wanted to visit Dr Kalam's hometown to pay him his respects. My son's school declares a holiday telling us, "Please use this time to talk about this great man to your children". I completely agree. The man is gone (unfortunately), but his memories should live on for ages and ages to come.

I open my facebook and for the last two days, the only thing I see is posts about this great person. His quotes, his pictures, his achievement, his schooling, all kind of anecdotes about him. Like everyone else, I diligently read them all. All of them go on to prove what a nice man he lived. What an honourable soul he proved to be. Made me wonder, why couldn't he be alive for some more time? Why did he have to go away. Imagine, if only he were alive now, how nice it would've been. He would've come up with many more inspiring books and speeches maybe. Maybe become the President for one more tenure. Maybe changed the world.

Then my logic slaps me hard on my face. He did try changing the world when he was alive. I didn't realize!! Why am I regretting now when he's gone? Why didn't I celebrate him when he were alive? Why didn't I search for his lovely motivational speeches when he gave it ? Why didn't I feel the urge to read his books back then? Why only now? That's a big why!! Imagine, now that Dr Kalam passed away, I'm feeling sad and wishing I knew more of the great man. If I would've read about him when he were alive, maybe I would've been more inspired. More maybe because, the great man who inspired me would have still been alive and would be doing wonderful things and would be able to do so in the future too.

I've spoken only about me. Only recorded my thoughts here. Imagine out of the entire population, if even 10% of the youngsters felt the same, that is, felt inspired and did something to make his dreams come true while he were alive, maybe he would've lived to see the day, the days his dreams come true! But, maybe its human psychology to learn the value of things only after we've lost it.

Makes me wonder, maybe that's why we have this concept of mothers day and fathers day. I used to shun the need of these 'days' and like many other people call it the influence of the other countries. Call it the gimmick of the greeting card companies, who stand to benefit on such occasions. But, think, if those days weren't there, would we all on our own, go to our mothers/fathers and tell them how much we love them and appreciate them being around. Needn't be able to tell them that in the eloquent words that the greeting cards use, but just with a smile and a great big hug! Don't you all agree? For those of you who are parents, I'm sure you would nod in agreement.

What I'm trying to say is, Dr Abdul Kalam, was a great man. Hold on, I'm going to change the tense and say, Dr Abdul Kalam 'is' a great man and will remain a hero in all our eyes and for all the generations to come. Some countries have dedicated a day of the year to him. So that we remember him on that day and talk to our children out him. I regret that he had to pass away. I wish he were still alive. But I cannot have my way. I'm not sure if we would find someone like him in the future, for me to start afresh and celebrate him while he is alive. However, what we could do, is to run to our mom/dad/grandpa/grandma/child/spouse, anyone, anyone who makes your life better, and give them a great big hug and make them feel celebrated! It's time to change!

Let's celebrate the special people in our lives. And because it is july the 30th, 2015, let's take a minute to close our eyes and thank Dr. APJ Abdul Kalam for having inspired us all the way! Salute! Rest in Peace Sir. Return If Possible! How I wish you could!

Tuesday, July 21, 2015

Why does motion sickness happen?

 I'm sure all of you would be familiar with motion sickness. If you are not a victim of one, you would've had a mom who has it or dad, or uncle, aunt or a distant relative, or at least a friend who cribs about it all the time. It is a common condition that occurs to some people when they travel in a car, train, plane, boat, roller coaster or similar amusement park rides. It starts as a feeling of uneasiness or sweating and progresses to maybe dizziness or nausea and vomiting. Have you ever wondered why this happens?

At least I'd never wondered all these years as to why something as simple as moving in a car should disturb your entire system and send you throwing up all over the place. Apparently, our brain receives signals from the ocular ( the eyes) and vestibular ( the ears ) systems for inputs on our movements. (if you are wondering how the ear is involved in detecting movement, please hold on to that question for another minute. For now just assume it has that added responsibility too apart from the usual hearing responsibility.)

What if the ear and the eyes give contradictory inputs to the brain? What happens then? Let's say the eyes are telling the brain that the person is not moving while the ear is telling the brain that the person is moving? The brain gets confused and assumes the worst, that we are hallucinating. And goes on to assume that we've been poisoned. So , it very dutifully sends signal to the gut asking it to empty its contents. Hence the never ending puke!!

If you would've noticed, the effects are accentuated when we are reading a book, or looking at a person and talking, or have our eyes fixed on our phones. Because in all these cases the eyes seem to think that we are not moving.  And if you've had your share of wise old grandparents, they would've suggested you to look out of the window to minimise the effects. Well, they were just helping your eyes understand that we were indeed in a state of motion!

Now the ear and it's extra power. The ear is more complex that we think. It can do more than just
hear. It has three semi circular canals which can detect rotations, namely, a twirl( we stand in one place and rotate our body till we get dizzy and drop off ), a cartwheel( gymnastic movement which looks like a sideways somersault ) and the nodding of the head movement. And it has two other small structures that can detect linear movement, head tilt and can detect how fast we accelerate. It sure looks complicated. I'm going to break it down to crude facts that give us the logic, logic enough to proceed with this post. Basically these semi circular canals or the two other small structures, they contain teeny hair particles, that detect the movement of a fluid present in them and transmit the information thus gathered to the concerned nerve endings, who so dutifully carry them along alerting the brain and the concerned parts of the body.

In fact motion sickness is one other common sickness like common cold, that is so less understood. Over the decades, everyone seems to have their own theory. We've heard the first theory so far. The brain gets confusing inputs from the two sensory organs and decides we are infected with toxins and helps us eliminate the toxins by throwing up. Before we move on to theory two, let me give some more information right about here.

According to theory number one, motion sickness happens in three ways. One, when the ears sense motion and the eye doesn't, as is the case with car sickness, air sickness, sea sickness,dizziness due to spinning. Two, when the ears don't sense any motion but the eyes do, as is the case with 3d movie viewing, virtual reality experience, for some, video game playing. Three, is when both sense motion, but they do not correspond, as is the case with moving on a bumpy rode at a slow speed. The eye thinks we are moving terribly slow, wherein the jerks make the ear feel that the movement is vigorous. Do look at the lovely video present in this page when you find time.

That being understood, lets move on to the theory number two. This theory is called negative reinforcement. For those of you who have toddlers or have children who have just passed the toddler phase, you know that an effective way of parenting is positive reinforcement. That is, when your child exhibits good behaviour, throw all the attention and love on him, thus reinforcing the fact that good behaviour gets rewards, thereby encouraging him to be a goody goody boy. Negative enforcement is just the opposite. When he does something bad, give him attention by punishing him reprimanding him, taking away screen time and so on. While this is not recommended to be a good parenting technique, it comes handy to understand what our body is telling us. When we spin in our favourite merry go round or one of those fancy rides in an amusement park, just for the kicks of it, our body doesn't like it. And would like to warn us never to do that again. So what does our body do? Gives us a series of unpleasant feelings to scare us away from doing it again.

One other theory is regarding the occular vestibular system. Just a fancy way of saying eye-ear system. Have you noticed, when you turn your head to the right, your eyes 'automatically' turn to the left. Why does this happen? When you turn your head to the right, the images on your retina get disturbed. So your eye moves in the opposite direction to compensate to make sure the images are intact. How does this happen? The ear, vestibular system, (like mentioned way above) can sense a head turn or a tilt. When it does that , it sends signals to the eye muscles asking them to move in the opposite direction. In our i'm-reading-a-book-in-the-car scenario, there are two type of eye movements. Voluntary (as in, when you read from left to right) and involuntary when your head moves because of the jerks on the road. Now when both these kind of movement excite the occular muscles, sometimes it so happens that they contradict each other and thereby end up exciting a nerve called the vagus nerve. Who is connected to the vomiting centre of the brain ( Yes, we do have something called the vomiting centre in our brains!!) And that sends us hurling unpleasant stuff from our gut all over the car! This vagus nerve also sends automatic reflexes like reducing the heart beat, the pressure and there by could get you to faint!

There could be more reasons but I think for a fair understanding three would do. Now, how do we treat this motion sickness? Some say, look out of the window, whiff of fresh air (car sickness), close your eyes, sleep. Some people tend to take some over the counter medication. What does this medication do? Prevents the nerves from getting excited, thereby preventing them from sending signals to the brain. These kind of medications, may induce blurriness of the vision because the inhibit the occular-vestibular co-operation. Other type of medications soothe the vomiting centre, thereby preventing a nasty throw up. The ones that soothe the vomiting centre also have some side effects that induce drowsiness, which in this case, adds on to our advantage.

There is no one solution yet that would cure motion sickness and free everyone from this inconvenience. And not everyone is affected the same way. This post is just a fair understanding of the subject. Let's look over or beyond or above or even under the horizon and hope for a break through to get us understand this bewildering behaviour of our very own human body. Doesn't it make you feel humble and doesn't it keep you grounded to know how much there is to learn yet, despite the immense developments and highly invested researches, despite the wondorous scientific advancement in the last decade. Amazing isn't it, the amount of mysteries waiting to be unlocked. For now, let's stay humbled and just say three very small aaaha's and be content!

Thursday, July 16, 2015

White tigers.. A beauty or a pity?

Oh.. look at him. Doesn't he exude pride and look majestic. I love tigers. One of the biggest species of the cat family. And I extremely adored the choice of tiger as our national animal (India's national animal). My son shares the same kinda love towards that animal. He says, "Appa, lets buy some tigers and make a zoo of our own!" You should've been there to look at the expression on his dad's face. A mixture of bewilderment and shock! Anyways, that's my small tiger, who thinks everything is possible.

And because this amazing species has reached its endangered status, the Indian government has taken measures to preserve them. There are 48 tiger reserves in India taken care of by Project Tiger ( a tiger conservation initiative) and did you know 70% of the tigers of the world are in India. I take immense pride. There are like some 6 subspecies of tigers prevalent today itseems. And the initiative takes care to preserve them.

Talking of subspecies and stuff, have you guyz seen the white tiger? That's a real beauty too you know! Imagine, the mere lack of colour gives him a distinct aura of mystery. Isn't it. I remember seeing him for the first time in the Zoo in Hyderabad and was totally fascinated. That must have been like 18 years back.

All my life I assumed white tigers were the albino counterparts of the normal majestic orange tigers. And that it is something that happened by chance in nature. But now, recently, a week back, I read ( from where else, my son's animal book ) that white tigers are not albinos. Albino indicates the complete lack of pigment it seems, and because these tigers do still adorn the black stripes, their condition is called leucistic, (a partial lapse of pigments) . The lapse is because of a particular gene and is hereditary.

And in the forest, this happens only one in 10,000 tigers. Why, simply because, nature doesn't encourage the white tigers. For a good reason. The cubs born with this genetic mutation are at an evolutionary disadvantage because they have lost their ability to camouflage or blend in with the surroundings. So, when they are born in the wild, mostly they die at young age, either  because they are hunted down easily or because of the number of health problems that come along with leucism. And as they die young, they don't live long enough to pass it on to their children. Thus is nature's way of eliminating something that is disadvantageous to the species. Amazing isn't it!

But, humans have a way to meddle with nature. We always do. We call it advancement of mankind! One king spotted this white tiger in the forest and as all kings have a habit of collecting rare things, captured this tiger. And he went on to breed this tiger with a normal orange tiger. Thus passing on the gene. (Apparently, this white gene is present in the Bengal Tigers. When the king gifted it to the US, they let it breed with Siberian Tigers. Most of the white tigers we see today is a crossbreed.)

A brief introduction to genetics will tell us why this whole white tiger breeding this is a disadvantage or an err to the species. Every(mostly, with a few exceptions) cell contains nucleus containing chromosomes. The number of chromosomes present in the cell depend on the species. Like humans have 23 pairs. The animals might have more or even less. What is important is , these chromosomes, contain something called DNA which control our traits. And during breeding or reproduction one of each pair of chromosomes are passed on from the parent to the child. That is to say, in humans, father has 23 pairs of chromosomes that define him and the mother has 23 pairs. They both pass on one of each pair, that is, 23 chromosomes each to the baby. So the baby shares both their traits. 23 from the father and 23 from the mother.

Some genes are recessive and some are dominant. Recessive meaning, if child has acquired the same gene from both parents, only then that trait would be displayed. Example is the green/blue eyes gene. Only if the blue eye gene is acquired from both the parent, the child will have blue eyes. Dominant gene is the one responsible for brown eye color. If the child acquires one brown eye gene from a parent, she/he gets the brown eyes.

The gene responsible for the white colour is a double recessive gene. Meaning has to be acquired from both the parents to be displayed in the cub. Which is also why it was rare in the wild. The king who captured the white tiger in the wild, allowed it to produce offsprings, all normal coloured, with a normal orange tiger. Later, he again mated the white tiger with one of the cubs thus produced. Now this cub would've carried one copy of the white gene. Mated with the white tiger, it produced 4 white cubs. The king was excited and he gifted two to the American National Zoo. Imagine how valued the gift must have been that day when no one had seen a white tiger ever.

The zoo got popular and the king got encouraged to make more of these. The process of breeding within the family is called inbreeding and this has a big fall side. Along with the white gene, inbreeding encourages the passing on of the other recessive or deleterious traits to the offspring. Apart from the other diseases that spread because of inbreeding, the white gene is associated with cross-eyed trait. That is, all white tigers are cross eyed (whether it is seen or not). That is the optic nerve is wired to the wrong side of the brain. Many cubs are born still, many are deformed.. oh the cruel/sad list never ends. I'm going to paste the list of deformities thus resulting from this very informative website right here.

A variety of birth defects are associated with the allele for leucism, including crossed eyes, cleft palate, spinal deformities, club foot, immune deficiencies, heart and kidney defects, hip dysplasia, hind-limb paralysis and mental disabilities. The practice of inbreeding generations of lions and tigers to produce leucism makes all the offspring (not just the rare white ones) more likely to suffer from this myriad of congenital illnesses and defects.

In addition, inbreeding increases the chances of stillbirths and infant mortalities, especially with further inbred generations. According to Big Cat Rescue, about eight in 10 white tigers die from inbreeding-related birth defects, and even the survivors tend to exhibit severe deformities and die young. Because they are so heavily inbred and almost always documented in captivity, white tigers and lions are also more likely to suffer from depression.


Now, isn't that sad. Brace yourselves, I'm going to tell you even worse stuff. Apparently, earlier, in certain parts of Africa, certain companies organized hunting trips for interested people. And the price of the experience or the trip depended on what animals were available to be hunted. For instance, if the package included hunting white lions/tigers, the price shot over the roof. And these companies employed breeders to breed these white animals just to have them shot!! Luckily, the African government intervened and I hear these operations are banned now. 

The other place where breeding white tigers paid off was at the zoo. People thronged the zoos just to catch a glimpse of these white tigers and the cute cuddly white cubs. Little did we know the immense suffering they have to go through all their life. Let's take a vow to spread the word. Out of every ten tigers that result from inbreeding, only 2 survive (for a while). The other 8 that are born ill, or born with deformities, are either killed or discarded because they don't fetch the bucks. And it doesn't stop here, out of the every 30 white tigers that are 'made', only 1 survives for quite some time. Do the math. Save the tigers. Not only is this sad for the white tigers, it also results in keeping the white gene still in the gene pool and preventing the white gene (the gene associated with deformities/sickness) from getting erased away, thereby reducing the survivability of the entire species.

I also read that the tiger species are endangered now. And are slowly getting erased away from the world. Due to million other reasons. And someone says, it might so happen that in the future, the only tigers we see are the ones in captivity. But the ones in captivity we have are all from the bad gene pool. Eventually resulting in extinction. 

Maybe the people back then didn't have much of an information about genes, mutation, recessive genes and stuff. We do. We understand. Maybe all they thought was to protect this white tiger which they thought was a species in itself. Sadly, it isn't a species. So it doesn't need saving. The nature is trying hard to protect the tigers from going extinct. Nature is trying hard to let the tigers be strong enough to survive. Let's join hands with the nature, and say no to white tigers when we see them. Let the poor thing live its life. It's our national animal after all. Let's protect it and treat it with the respect it deserves!

Some amazing websites :

Monday, July 13, 2015

If the Earth is really moving, why don't we feel it?

We know the earth is constantly in motion. It is moving. Why don't we feel it? Have we ever felt the jerk or felt being pushed out or have we ever lost balance because of the earth's motion? No! why not? And just for fun, do you know the earth's speed of rotation and revolution? 1670kmph and 108,000 kmph respectively. Did your jaw just drop wide open? Mine sure did.

More questions to think over. Imagine a man riding a horse. He is in motion, say constant speed. He just throws up a ball, high up into the air (while riding on the horse). Will the ball fall in front of him, behind him or right into his hand?

Imagine sailing in a boat. Let's say a guy is sitting at the head of the mast. High up. He is now dropping a ball down. And hey, the boat is sailing, i.e., in constant speed. Will the ball fall plop into the water? or somewhere towards the end of the boat? That is, by the time the ball fell down, would the boat have moved away?

Ponder a little, have your answers handy, and read on. Let's start with what we already know. The Earth is moving and we don't feel it. Let's imagine a similar scenario. You are seated in your car and travelling. You do know that you are moving and you definitely feel jerks. Let's analyse it. How do you know you are moving? You see out, you see things zoom past you, you feel the gush of the wind. You feel the jerks because of the bumps on the road. Imagine, a smooth road, and imagine you can't see out and imagine the car is travelling at the same speed. Will you feel you are moving now?

Similar case is travelling in the plane. You definitely feel it when the plane takes off and lands. But when it is high up in the air, do you feel the movement? You don't. Why because, the plane is then travelling at a constant speed.

Let's get to the horse-man-throws-ball case. The man is on the horse and the horse is moving. The man and the horse are moving at the same speed. Similarly, when the ball is in the man's hand, it also shares the same speed. Now, when he throws the ball up, the ball has both upward velocity and velocity of the horse. So, the ball doesn't go right up and come down in a straight line, but in a parabola. (that is, like an inverted 'u'). So the ball finds its place back in the man's hand. And so is the case with the ball that falls from the mast. It falls right where it would if the boat wasn't moving.

Please go through this interactive from this wonderful website and this video. They explain in detail about the horse-man-ball scenario and the ship-mast-ball scenario and a couple more interesting things.

To sum up, like the ball in the horse man's hand, we share the velocity of the earth. And like the in car and in the plane, you are moving with the Earth, but, with an Earth that moves at a constant speed. If the Earth suddenly speeds up or slows down (God forbid), then we might, ( God knows what ), maybe fall down.



Thursday, July 9, 2015

Why are hill stations cold?

A few months back we took a road trip to ooty or ootacamund, a hill station in tamil nadu, India. This is the conversation between my son and I.

Son : "Ma, aren't we climbing up a mountain?" .
I      : "Yes".
He   : "Aren't we moving closer to the sky and the sun ? Why are we feeling cold?".
I      : "Hmmm.. well.."

And flashback time it is! You know in the olden day movies, to depict a flashback, they show us a spiralling thing. Anyways, all I tried telling was, it got me back to my school days.

I'm sure all of you would've learnt about water cycle in your good old school days. I think I learnt it somewhere in my 2nd standard. My son is learning about it in the lower kindergarten. Things are moving fast now a days. Anyways, besides the point. From the water cycle, we all know one thing. Water from the seas, oceans and the rivers, evaporates and we distinctly remember seeing red lines or rather red curves representing the water vapors, rising up. With the explanation, hot air rises. Well, if that be the case, shouldn't the hills and the mountains all be warm or maybe even hot ? (hot from all the hot air that rises)

One more perspective to look at this whole thing, like how my 3 year old pointed out,  we know our main source of heat is the sun. And the sun is high up in the sky. No denying that. One might argue that closer to the heat source, the hotter you feel. That is, the hills being closer to the sun than the ground, the hills should feel warmer than the plain land.

Two different perspectives, with good amount of logic, all telling us one thing. Hills should be hot or atleast warm. But from our experience, we know that the hills or hill stations, are cold. How could that be? What went wrong in my logic? Was my water cycle theory, the one that is clearly etched in my mind through the years wrong, or ..is the sun not high up in the sky?? Let's think this one through!

The water cycle is not wrong. Just think one step ahead. Why does hot air rise? When air gets heated, what happens actually? The molecules in the air, gain some energy. (heat is a form of energy) and the molecules, with their newly acquired energy move faster and bombard into each other and they tend to push the surrounding cold (not hot) molecules aside. And in the process, they've expanded and spent some energy too. Once they expand, they become less dense. And from our previous post, we know that the less dense substance when immersed in a denser substance, rises up due to buoyancy force. That's precisely why the hot air rises.

If you would've carefully read the above paragraph, you would've already said "voila, now I know why the hills are cold". The hot air spends some energy in expanding. Which means it becomes cold. The air that rises, eventually becomes cold. ( Now, a very good follow up question would be, why didn't it sink back then. Now that it is is cold, shouldn't it reverse all the effects that the heat caused and sink back down? There air on top is comparatively less denser than that of the lower layers. So, this cold air needn't sink down. Same density as the surroundings.)

That's one explanation. I've done some reading on the internet and I've found some different perspectives on this. Let me share them too, for completeness. Oh hold on, I still didn't explain what was wrong with the it-should-be-hotter-in-the-hills-because-its-closer-to-the-sun theory. Do you know how far up in the sky is the sun? It is a whopping 150 million kms. Compare that with the height of the heighest mountain you've ever heard of.. 9kms maybe? So whether you are on the top of the highest mountain or on the plain, it doesn't make a difference. We are still the same distance away from the sun, which is, very very very far away.

One more way of looking at why the hills are cold will be, the lower layers of the atmosphere are under pressure from the upper layers. So are usually compressed and under pressure. The upper layers experience lesser pressure. When the gas is under more pressure, it tends to be warmer. Because when a lot of gas molecules are trapped under a small space, the molecules bombard against each other and are in constant motion and hence get heated up. More the pressure, more the heat. And lesser the pressure, lesser the heat.

Another explanation, the sun's heat reaches us as light rays. not as heat waves. Through radiation that is. Once the surface of the earth absorbs it, it releases it as heat waves. One way to see it is that , the air near the earth is dense, so it absorbs more of this heat energy. The air near the mountains is less dense, and it absorbs less of the heat energy. And the layers of air closer to the earth are more warm as compared to the ones near the hills. Also, as the pointed mountain has lot more surface area than the plain, it tends to dissipate more of the absorbed heat, making it a cooler place.

Another one, imagine the layers of air above the earth as blankets you use to cover yourself. If you have one blanket over you, you feel warm. If you have two, you feel warmer. If you have three, you feel hot probably.. You get it? The more number of atmospheric layers on the plains, the more of the heat they hold within them. So you can say, as you go higher up, you start losing the blankets on top of you.

I didn't try explaining atmospheric pressure and density and buoyancy to my 3 year old. I just used the blanket analogy and he seemed happy. For a whole week, he went around asking this question to the adults he came across, and whether they gave him an answer or not, he said, "No. Let me tell you. It is because the hills have only two layers of air, whereas we have 10." And immediately thereafter, he made it a point to find me to give me a hi-fi! Oh, the joys of being a mom.

So essentially, it all boils down to these. The air in the plains are under a lot of pressure. So they are dense. They absorb heat faster, and they also act like a blanket and keep the heat there for us. The air that gets warm, tends to have lot of energy and tends to push the surrounding air particles, thereby expanding and hence rises due to buoyancy, and loses heat in the process, thereby becoming cold. The mountains being pointy and having more surface area, tend to dissipate their heat quicker. And that is why the air in the mountains feel cold. Aaha!